2016 – the year where it all caught up with us

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to supporters as he takes the stage for a campaign event in Dallas, Monday, Sept. 14, 2015. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

This is a post about the political situation in 2016 and it’s root causes. It is written from the perspective of a UK citizen.

It’s been a strange year. We have experienced two major political upsets – Brexit and Trump, and there is almost certainly more to come. In the weeks following the US election, the Italian Prime Minister lost his job in a referendum vote, and Marine Le Pen is expected to make major gains in the French elections in April.

It seems that collectively, we’ve had enough. People say they’ve had enough of listening to experts, enough of unelected bureaucrats and enough of all our jobs going abroad or being taken by immigrants. In the UK, we were told that leaving the EU would hurt us financially but we did it anyway. In the US, Hillary Clinton was the most qualified presidential candidate ever, having already spent eight years in the White House alongside her husband, and another four years as Secretary of State. But a vote for Hillary was also a vote for the status quo, so she lost to business man and TV celebrity with no political experience at all.

There are many different causes behind these events, but I believe the biggest part of it is that the concerns and needs of the public have repeatedly been ignored in favour of other interests, and it’s been going on for too long. As a result of this, there are major issues of trust and engagement between the public and the political system.

Iraq War

In 2003, the UK went to war despite the largest public protests seen in decades. To try and make the case for war, the Government published intelligence that led us to believe that Saddam Hussein was developing chemical weapons and was a direct threat to the UK and the rest of the world.

Many people were suspicious of the intelligence at the time, but we didn’t quite live in an era where we knew we could be lied to or misled. An official inquiry examined the evidence and found that one part of the intelligence described chemical weapons made up of glass spheres. No chemical weapons have ever been made like that, except in the well-known Nic Cage and Sean Connery thriller ‘The Rock’. The thought of inaccurate intelligence being used to justify a war is obscene, but 10 years later no-one seems to care. The media report on it, but everything goes on as before.

Financial Crisis

Then came the 2008 financial crash. Enabled by Clinton-era deregulation, bad maths and cocaine-fuelled greed, a chain reaction of bad debt crippled global banking organisations. The situation was so bad that countries had to bail out their banks with unthinkable sums of money.

Once again, people took to the streets in protest. In the US, the Occupy movement set up camp in cities across the country. Their slogan was “We are the 99%”, highlighting the rising inequality between the ultra-rich 1% who control large corporations and exert enormous influence on our political system.

In the UK alone, our bank bailout cost £500 billion, doubling the national debt and pushing it past the £1 trillion mark. And just like having too much personal debt, we are now struggling to pay off what we owe because of the size of the interest payments.

Internet activism

Following the financial crash, things got really interesting. Internet activists like Aaron Schwartz took on the establishment, trying to free up information and prevent profiteering from publicly funded research. Julian Assange took things even further and started to serve up classified communications between governments and the military. With the Arab Spring, countries used social media to organise protests and overthrow regimes.

It was a bumpy ride. Many felt people felt that Wikileaks was damaging and destabilising, but whichever way you feel about it, it can’t be denied that we now know more about what goes on behind closed doors, and have a clearer picture of the difference between what the public gets told and what is actually taking place. And underlying it all was an optimistic sense that the public might get some power back, and bring society back into a true democracy.


So where are we now? The people who brought about the Iraq war are no longer in power. Tony Blair was heavily criticised in the Chilcot Inquiry, but that is as far as it went. War has spread from Afghanistan to Syria, and caused the worst devastation yet.

The bank bailout is now old news. No-one wants to hear people complaining about it any more, despite the fact that it’s caused massive national debt. Economies are so fragile that Governments have cut taxes and interest rates down to the bone, hoping people will continue going to the shops. At the same time, the need for austerity means significant public spending cutbacks. Against a backdrop of increased need from an ageing population, the UK now has major NHS problems and a social care crisis.

Even worse, nearly a decade after the crisis, none of the banking safeguards have been restored. It could all happen again. There should have been global coordination t fix this, but apparently we don’t have a mechanism for that. Or, perhaps it wasn’t even seriously attempted. In the US under George W. Bush, the Treasury Department was controlled by investment bankers. And other countries who wanted to regulate were faced with a problem – if they did it and others didn’t follow, they would be disadvantaging their own financial institutions against the rest of the world.

Internet activism has been almost completely destroyed. Aaron Schwartz committed suicide while under heavy pressure during a prosecution brought for theft of information. Julian Assange is a wanted man and is in limbo in the Ecuadorian embassy. 4Chan are still around but are less focused and coordinated.


While it would be an exaggeration to say that democracy has broken down in my country, there are major problems. The last 15 years has made it very clear that we are not being listened to, or told what the real agenda is behind events. Every now and then a speech is made that says “we are listening, and we will build a society that works for everyone”. Theresa May did this, and threw in a few ideas like putting workers on company boards. Then quietly it was all pushed under the carpet, deemed to be impractical or too heavy-handed. So we’re now faced with a population that isn’t prepared to tow the line any more. The relationship has broken down on both sides. Protest votes are now very common and set to continue.

Not only are governments out of touch with the public, they are out of touch with the changed world, having been overtaken and sidelined by global finance, military and technology corporations that are now extremely powerful, and play a major part in all of our lives. No government will admit it, but their powers are greatly diminished, sometimes simply by the rather obvious limitation of being an entity from a single country compared to corporations that span the globe.

People are punishing governments for failing to prevent their jobs from moving abroad or being automated, but governments are almost powerless to prevent it. We have embraced Capitalism in it’s purest form – neo-liberalism. Decades later, the absolute minimum of rules or regulations now stand in it’s way. Globalisation is here to stay.

In part 2 of this series, I’ll look into how the British political system can adapt to the modern world and suggest how to restore faith and re-engage with the public

Why Windows will move to a Linux kernel

For the past few months I’ve been thinking over an idea that initially sounded crazy, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. The idea is that Windows will become a GUI layer and set of services that run over the top of a Linux core. The NT kernel will be obsoleted.

Why would this ever happen? It’s fairly safe to say it wouldn’t be for technical reasons. Changing to a Linux kernel wouldn’t suddenly grant superpowers to Windows. It would be pretty much business as usual. You could argue the pro’s and con’s of the Linux kernel vs the NT kernel forever, but although they are architecturally different, the end results are broadly comparable. Although it has to be said, it will be a considerable upgrade for Windows to gain the improved security and file hierarchy of Unix systems.

No, this would be a business decision. Microsoft is facing the problem of a declining market share for desktop computing. The rise of mobile devices has eaten away at the size of the desktop/laptop computing market, and this looks set to continue. OEM hardware manufacturers have rapidly shifted focus towards mobile devices. Maintaining a full stack proprietary operating system like Windows is expensive. Especially with all the backwards compatibility they have to worry about. It would be much cheaper to just use open source foundations and build on top of that.

In this changing world, Microsoft has already made big changes to what Windows actually is as a product with Windows 10. It’s billed “the last version of Windows”, not because they’re stopping developing it but because it’s going to be a provided as a service – a continually updated product, with major version releases a thing of the past. Another interesting change with this new delivery model is the reduced testing effort, itself a cost cutting measure. Nowadays, Windows releases are signed off based on telemetry from beta testers in the Insider programme, rather than internal QA teams. Early builds of Windows 10 suffered as a result, but recently this has improved markedly.

So how would this idea work? Well, an engineering task like replacing the Windows kernel is certainly a massive job, but Microsoft are the best in the industry at this. They made 32-bit software run brilliantly on 64-bit Windows years before Apple did the same trick. They also pulled off some pretty crazy virtualisation tricks with the Xbox One, running two virtual machines on top of a hypervisor. So Microsoft could pull this off, of that I am certain. They would run the old NT kernel in a VM on top of Linux, and run existing software inside it. Slowly, software would be rewritten to run against the Linux kernel and custom Windows-specific layers above that.

The end result would be unification with the other two desktop operating systems – Linux and macOS. It would reduce maintenance costs for Windows significantly, and make life a lot easier for power users such as developers.

Perhaps the Bash Shell for Windows introduced with the Windows 10 Anniversary Update is the first step in this direction.

What I would do to fix Twitter

Twitter’s lack of progress in delivering new features and business models is astonishing. It’s not hard to see why there’s regular talk of bad financial results and a buyout. But at the same time, it’s an essential service for journalists and folks in other industries like tech and entertainment.

Here’s a quick list of what I would do with Twitter given the chance to try and turn it around:

– Features: get rid of the 140 character limit. Or rather, keep it as the headline, and add a body section that can contain a full post, or a longer summary with a link to the full article for sites that need onsite traffic. I must be the millionth person to ask for this, but even so, it’s still relevant. Why the hell has this not happened?

– Features: Powerful organising tools. Why on earth can’t I arrange the people and organisations I follow into some sensible structure, nested as deep as necessary? I’d like a celebrities folder, perhaps with Actors under there, and finally a link to video of Robert de Niro raging against Donald Trump. This structure would help deal with the firehose you get when you follow more than 5 people. I know you can create lists, but they are limited, and in the official client are hidden away in secret menus .

– Features: Unread marks per feed. When I open Robert de Niro’s feed, I only want to see new tweets, but with an toggle to view older ones. Now, holding unread marks on every tweet for every twitter user could be a bit of an engineering nightmare, so a simple “high water mark” of the last tweet that I read will be fine.

– Business: Paid accounts. An individual (perhaps even a celebrity) should get a free account, although some sort of paid premium account to attract celebs seems worth looking into, but businesses like media outlets who tweet every story they publish should be paying to be on Twitter.

– Business: Find a buyer in the media/publishing industry. Talk of Salesforce and Disney buying Twitter is insane – no wonder they walked away. Twitter is most valuable to media outlets and self promoters, and needs to be owned by someone in that industry.

Some people will look at this list and think the features sounds familiar, because it’s all borrowed from RSS – or at least high quality RSS clients like Reeder on iOS. And why not? RSS is excellent at dealing with a high volume of information. I am a big fan of Reeder and still use RSS heavily. Compared to Twitter, RSS is somewhat lacking in other departments, and is arguably dated. RSS is ripe to be replaced by Twitter if it could get it’s act together. And best of all, none of these features would make Twitter worse at what it’s used for now. They are complimentary.

When Google killed Google Reader back in 2013, Twitter should have been standing by to take over with a powerful platform to track news and status updates from people.

As far as I’m aware the features described above aren’t available in third party Twitter clients, but even if they are, they should be in the core product.

Come on Twitter, get it together. I’ve tried many times over the years to get into Twitter and use it regularly, but it just doesn’t work for me, and this keeps me on RSS. I can’t be the only one.

The Last of Us review


Naughty Dog’s apocalyptic epic “The Last of Us” has received huge critical acclaim since it’s release on the PS3 back in 2013. After playing the game to completion, I can see why – it elevates gaming beyond anything else I’ve experienced. Some games – Halo for example – have a backdrop that would make a great basis for a film (a Halo film has been mooted for years now), but you could make an Oscar-winning film from TLOU simply by filming shot-for-shot remakes of the cutscenes and game scenes with real actors. The quality of writing really is that good. The characters are complex, carrying huge emotional baggage and their moods perfectly suit the theme of the game – a study of human behaviour during a desperate struggle for survival.

Is it a zombie story? Well, of sorts. The Cordyceps fungi (which is real but thankfully only affects insects in real-life) mutates and infects humans. Growths in the brain quickly affect behaviour, turning people into extremely aggressive zombie-like killers. In the opening scene of the game, society disintegrates rapidly as the the outbreak takes hold. At this point many modern games would start with bombastic scenes of terror and explosions, but TLOU knows how to build up tension. It starts with you controlling a young girl who has just woken up in the middle of the night and is searching the house for her father. Something is definitely wrong – there’s a distant explosion and as you move downstairs an ambulance races past the house. Move into another room, and Joel (the father) leaps in through a patio door and slams it closed. An infected neighbour bangs against the window a few times and soon smashes through. By now Joel is armed and shoots him dead. Shooting someone means very little in the hollywood-style opening scenes of games like Call of Duty, but here it has real impact.

Once the opening credits have finished, it’s 25 years later and very bleak. Think of the worst urban decay you’ve seen in an inner city – and imagine everywhere looking like that. From now on, the main part of the story involves Joel escorting Ellie across country. It’s a mix of exploration and the most nerve-wracking gun battles ever seen in a game. There’s always too many baddies and never enough ammo. On the infected side, there’s a number of variations which differ by the severity of their affliction. Clickers are blind and search by sound alone, and this is where the stealth element comes into play. Press the right trigger and Joel goes into stealth mode. Everything turns black and white, and the location of enemies is overlaid on the screen based on being able to hear their movements. Creeping through areas overrun with baddies is heart-poundingly tense, but it does suffer from one of my frequent annoyances with the stealth element of gaming – creeping around is frustrating when you’re not sure where you’re supposed to be going.

If there is a problem with TLOU, it’s that it cannot really be described as fun or enjoyable in the sense that many games are. My resolve as a gamer was definitely tested – at 55% complete I was (like the characters) starting to ask myself whether it was just too hard to keep struggling on. After a few days off, I returned to the game back in a difficult sewer section and got killed repeatedly. The answer to this – for me at least – turned out to make a real difference in my experience of the game. I turned on aim assist and dropped the difficulty to easy. Shameful I know, but at least it gave me the resolve to keep fighting. In easy mode there’s a few less baddies in each section, and the aim assist means you can get on with the job of blowing opponents away instead of struggling to line up a cross hair with the Dual Shock stick.

As you might expect from a Naughty Dog game, TLOU is a close technical relative of the Uncharted games, which is of course a good thing. Even on the PS3 there’s enough polygons on screen to impress a PC gamer, as well as some gorgeous lighting effects. The PS4 remake ups the visual quality and runs it at 60fps which makes an enormous difference to responsiveness. I found with the PS4 version there was no need to drop the difficulty or use aim assist.

TLOU is like one of the best films you’ve ever seen, except you get to play the main character throughout a story that runs to something like 15 hours. It’s gruelling, touching and the final scenes will linger in your memory for a long time to come.

If you’ve not played it yet, I highly recommend it.

Nokia Lumia 800 review

Since leaving the world of iOS in February 2010 I’ve not managed to settle in anywhere else. The HD7 I tried first was exciting to begin with but quickly became frustrating due to the lack of decent apps and the limitations of the pre-Mango Windows Phone operating system. After that it was a visit to the world of rooting and constant flashing with Android, thanks to the Samsung Galaxy S. TO be fair, the unofficial CyanogenMod builds of Ice Cream Sandwich were starting to look very good, but the hardware wasn’t proving very durable.

When pictures first appeared of the Nokia Lumia range of phones, I was really taken in. The Lumia range consists of two new handsets – the entry-level 710 and the premium 800. It was actually preview pictures for the Lumia 900 some months later that got me thinking about getting another WP7 handset. The design of the handset was something I found really appealing, and even though I had ditched it once already, I remembered quite a few aspects of WP7 that I really liked. So I sold the Galaxy S and traded up to a second-hand Lumia 800 in as-new condition. The decision to go with the 800 rather than wait for the 900 was mainly because I found the 4.3″ HD7 phone a but unwieldy to use in practice and thought the Lumia 900 would have the same issue.

Initial impressions of the Lumia 800 were good – the combination of a very high quality piece of hardware design and the stylish Metro user interface do work very well together.  I believe that after the iPhone, the Lumia 800 is the best phone on the market today for design and build quality. The case and curved glass screen have a real quality feel – unlike HTC phones there’s no hollow clacking noise when you tap the screen with your fingernail. The Lumia glass is much thicker and feels super-smooth to glide your finger over. The bright tiles of the Start screen look amazing on the rich black background, and it’s often impossible to see where the case ends and the screen starts. Turn on the screen and put the phone down at the side of you and it can be a little bit surreal to look at – the way the bright interface elements glow from the deep black laminated screen is really eye-catching. You can see effect to some extent in the main picture at the top of this post. The effect is probably more noticeable on black phones rather than the blue/pink/white colours.

A less impressive aspect of the phone was the well-publicised firmware issues that did their best to ruin the ownership experience. Terrible battery life due to a power drain problem meant that the phone wouldn’t last a day even when hardly used, and music playback quality through the headphone socket was very disappointing. Both of these issues are now fixed – battery life is much improved although still not brilliant, but audio quality through my Sennheiser earphones is excellent – noticeably better than the iPhone 4 and a bit better than my Galaxy S.

Other reviews have criticised the folding door that covers the power socket, which is understandable because it looks easy to break and could be considered inconvenient. Personally, it hasn’t bothered me. I am more bothered by the amount of buttons down the right hand side of the phone – in practice is not as bad as it might look but can be cumbersome. The fact that Microsoft dictate there must be a physical camera button is annoying when on-screen buttons work perfectly well.

The Lumia 800 has a single-core processor – low-end compared to the latest Android phones but the single-core Lumia flies along with it’s well-optimised operating system. Windows Phone makes heavy use of GPU acceleration to relieve the workload on the CPU, and everything is silky smooth. Android phones need a lot more CPU power to run smoothly, and even then you will still see stutters if you look closely enough.

The Mango update is a strange beast – at first it doesn’t seem any different to the earlier release but in fact it’s much more usable. There are still glaring omissions like not being able to paste a phone number into the dialler screen (the web browser rarely picks up numbers to make them clickabe), but on the whole it’s much better. The biggest improvement is the appearance of a proper task switcher that is called up by long-pressing the back button. This fixes the terrible task switching system in earlier versions, which  caused awful usability problems in certain scenarios. Another improvement is the IE9 browser which has a significantly better rendering engine. Almost all web pages now look great which could not be said of IE7 on pre-Mango. IE9 also has a great feature – the address bar is at the bottom. This simple difference from other mobile browsers makes a big difference in practice. I develop mobile web sites and when testing them the experience of using them on WP7 is made much more app-like by this nifty little user interface feature – the header bar of the mobile site appears right at the top of the screen, just like a real app.

The software catalogue is also much improved since the early days of Windows Phone. Most major apps are now present, and the best ones make their iOS/Android equivalents look dated and simplistic. When publishers really get to grips with the Metro UI the results can be fantastic – the Windows Phone version of LinkedIn is by far the best, and a real surprise was the brilliantly-designed app that Oxfam have released. Even so, there are still some missing apps. Top game titles from iOS and Android are either not ported over or take forever to arrive. My biggest annoyance is still the lack of a native Amazon (UK) app – the mobile site works but is pretty crappy. And prices are still silly – especially for game titles. How would you like to pay £3.99($4.99) for Pacman?

Overall, I would recommend the Lumia very highly but it’s essential that you’re not heavily invested in iOS or Android. You need to be sure you can wean yourself off these ecosystems. It is difficult for many people to switch from iOS with it’s convenience and huge software catalogue. Moving from Android is probably slightly easier. If you own an older Windows Phone model though, the Lumia represents a great buy.

Things are very different in the world of WP7 compared to other platforms, but if the operating system appeals to you then the Lumia will show it off at it’s best. It scores highly by combining a great operating system with a very stylish and high quality piece of phone hardware. You also get a nice warm fuzzy feeling from owning a Nokia again after all these years.

Game Review: L.A. Noire

Thinking of picking up L.A. Noire preowned or discounted? Here’s a retrospective review of L.A. Noire, played to completion on the xbox 360 last summer.

I am a big fan of Rockstar and their open-world games. GTA IV has taken up huge amounts of my time – it might not be perfect but nothing else has come close to combining a convincing virtual world with a good storyline and solid gameplay. Red Dead Redemption is another Rockstar title I enjoyed enormously, once getting past the fairly slow early stages. Although a barren wilderness, the world of RDR still manages to be beautifully detailed and varied. The game does a great job of keeping you entertained while keeping something back to surprise you later. Towards the end of the campaign the action shifts from dry deserts to snow-covered hills lit by the winter sun, and it looks so good you’ll find yourself stopping just to admire the views.

When trailers for L.A. Noire were released onto the web, it was easy to get excited at how good this game was going to be. The setting of 1940’s LA in a film-noire style promises much in the way of atmosphere and immersion, and the ground-breaking facial animation technology promised the player they would actually be looking for signs of lies and truth in the faces of suspects and witnesses. Also present is a new lighting technology that provides much more realistic shadows and reflections, and was actually the genesis for the whole idea of the game. The demo showed two detectives chasing down a suspect, set in a brilliantly convincing post-war Los Angeles. It looked amazing.

Load the actual game up and things still look good – the title screen and Taxi-Driver-style music are very noire, and as you start to make progress it’s clear that the storyline and characters are not far off Hollywood standards. Driving round LA, gathering evidence at crime scenes and taking part in the occasional shoot-out is quite captivating. If you’ve ever wanted to get into a time machine and experience the past, this is game is for you. It’s fascinating to see Los Angeles before the urban sprawl of today took hold – you’ll be struck by how low the skyline is without all the modern high-rise office blocks and apartments. As you might expect, the police department is similarly under-developed, with questionable behaviour and practices, and corruption being commonplace among your colleagues.

Rockstar made it clear from the start that this game is not GTA. It is more of an adventure game with occasional action sequences, and is best suited to older gamers. The story is split into four sections as your character – Cole Phelps – is promoted (and demoted) around the LAPD. The game eases you in gently by having you work traffic before throwing you into homicide, vice and arson. Cole is ex-army and the back story of his time in the forces is inserted into the game via the use of flashbacks.

If you’re interested in modern history and culture, there’s a lot to enjoy and appreciate. You’ll get to see the large post-war housebuilding projects that took place in California, including visiting a stunning architects office. There’s references to the Black Dahlia, and other cases are inspired by real-life events. Some of the building interiors are a treat for Art Deco fans, and Union station is well worth some virtual tourism. On the flip-side, some of the murder scenes can be disturbing and there’s some other unpleasant subjects covered such as the exploitation of young girls. You’ll certainly see both sides of the city.

Unfortunately L.A.Noire is flawed in a way that detracts from the overall experience quite significantly. Rockstar’s new facial animation technology might be a step forward but it’s still not as good as they would have you believe – I just couldn’t get to grips with interviewing. In many cases the evidence isn’t substantial and the facial expressions aren’t conclusive enough to be able to really tell if a suspect is lying. Many people being interviewed give off misleading signs. A young girl who had been raped was one prime example – she seemed evasive as if covering something up, but pressing her to spill the beans was punished as the wrong option, making me feel guilty for not treating her more sympathetically. There is one intuition point available for when you can’t work out what to do, but in some parts I felt like I needed intuition for every question, and found myself dreading the interview and interrogation scenes. Something else bothered me as well – Cole Phelps looks odd. Something about his face doesn’t look right. Aaron Stanton, who is the actor for Phelps looks normal enough, so I’m not sure what the problem is. It’s a pity because all of the other characters in the game look fine.

Whilst working homicide, your patience and discipline will be tested when you realise that you’re solving murders by locking up innocent people – because you can’t find the serial killer who’s really behind the crimes. While this illustrates what the police could be like sixty years ago, it doesn’t do much for player morale. Of the four sections to the game, I found arson much more enjoyable than the others. There is a common story running throughout, and the cases rely more on evidence gathering at the crime scene rather than trying to work out if a wooden-looking suspect is lying or not.

When I look back on L.A. Noire now, it certainly left an impression on me – some sequences from the game are so memorable they feel like they are on equal footing with real-life memories, demonstrating how immersive a modern game can be. Sadly, the enjoyment and reward factor is lacking in some areas. Overall, L.A.Noire is a typically ambitious Rockstar game, and it nearly delivers. Experiencing a brilliantly realised 1940’s Los Angeles is worth the purchase price alone,  but one of the biggest parts of the game play can be very frustrating. If you’re looking for an atmospheric adventure game with a crime focus, this could be worth a look, but it’s a mixed bag.

How to fix your Nokia Lumia 800 battery problems


Update: Nokia has released another update that fully resolves the battery problem, and audio quality issues. As of 4th March, this update is making it’s way out to handsets. It’s best to wait for this update rather than follow the guide below.

When I first got my Lumia it was running the latest firmware and OS (11500 and 8107 respectively) so the battery life issues confirmed by Nokia shortly after launch should no longer have been present. Unfortunately this was not the case.

The only way to get through the day on a single charge was to avoid using the phone. By doing this I could get from 7.30am when I take it off charge through to 11pm when going to bed and plugging it in overnight. The problem is that the Lumia is actually a great phone – the combination of top-notch hardware and the much improved Windows Phone 7 mean that you will actually want to use it. But using it only moderately meant it would be completely dead before 10pm.

Clutching at straws

After reading the online XDA and Nokia forums, it seems many other people are still having serious battery issues. Quite a few users report things getting even worse after the update, and have been battling to roll it back. But at the same time, there are others who say everything is fine. To try and find some improvement I tried a few experiments – the first being to install the diagnostics app using the ##634# code in the dialler. But all this told me was power usage and battery stats. I disabled any background services, but this made no difference. I also tried turning off 3G, which did make a big difference although it’s  not really a solution and is an inconvenience when out and about, away from a wifi service. People were recommending to uninstall the Diagnostics app so this was also tried, but made no difference.

The fix

Eventually I made a breakthrough. One or two people on XDA were saying that they had done a hard reset on their phone and this had solved the problem. I was reluctant to try this because of the hassle of reinstalling all my apps, losing SMS messages and then finding  I’d wasted my time. After a busy weekend where battery life had been a real inconvenience, I decided to give it a try and deal with the chore of reinstalling everything.

The hard reset process is to use the Windows “reset phone” option in settings to wipe all data, then turn the phone off and use a “three finger salute” to factory-reset the phone. The exact procedure is:

  1. Wipe the phone using Settings > About > Reset your phone
  2. Turn the phone off
  3. While holding down the Volume Down and Camera buttons, hold down the Power button until the phone vibrates
  4. Release the power button
  5. Wait 5 seconds, then release the Volume Down and Camera buttons

The phone is now completely reset and will boot up from scratch, having to set up the OS and then install the Nokia apps.

After this I noticed a massive improvement in battery life, to the point where the remaining percentage doesn’t drop below 50% in a full day of moderate use. It looks like the phone could stand a day of heavy use and still have plenty in reserve. My current battery stats are 75% remaining after being off charge for 14 hours! Estimated time remaining is another 1 day and 5 hours. It’s not just estimates either, because the phone now lasts till bedtime without shutting down.

Something is wrong with the last Nokia update. I believe it doesn’t install correctly even though the version numbers in the Settings page look correct. This is based on me noticing another change introduced in the latest update that has only take effect on my phone since the hard reset. The soft buttons under the screen no longer light up on full brightness, which some are reporting as a bug, although I think it’s a power saving measure – the phone is usually only at full brightness when outside in the sun, when the soft buttons would be clearly visible without being lit.

If you’re fed up with your Lumia, try the hard reset. It’s a great phone, don’t let yourself get disillusioned by the awful battery life.